Economics professor Emi Nakamura, known for her research on price "stickiness" and the economic effects of government spending, won the John Bates Clark Medal this past May. The annual award from the American Economic Association recognizes the best American economists under the age of 40. Cited for her data-oriented, empirical approach to macroeconomics, she was the fourth woman to win the price since it was introduced in 1947. In an interview, she discusses her background and research, collaborations with her husband, J?n Steinsson, also an economics professor at Berkeley, and her perspective on the economics field's gender imbalance. Asked how she'd advise a president of the U.S. to govern differently, she replies: "One crucial thing to remember right now is how important the institution of the Federal Reserve is. People forget what a remarkable victory we've had when it comes to inflation. Back in 1980, inflation was over 10 percent, and there was a general sense that it was very hard to lower inflation. There are still many countries in the world where this is the case. But in the United States, inflation over the last 30 or 40 years fell dramatically, and now it been very stable, around 2 percent for many years. This is an enormous victory. My sense is that it has a lot to do with the fact that the Federal Reserve is such a strong institution, and quite an apolitical institution, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. This institution took a really long time to build up. This is something we have to really be careful about not destroying, because it takes a long time to get it back." For more on Professor Nakamura, see our press release at Berkeley News.

The American Economic Association has awarded economics professor Emi Nakamura its John Bates Clark Medal, a prestigious honor for economists who are under the age of 40 and have made significant contributions to the field. Professor Nakamura is the fourth woman to win the award since it was inaugurated in 1947. In their citation, they praised her distinctive approach and creativity. "One of the central challenges is that we don't get to do experiments in economic policy as compared to the sciences," Professor Nakamura says. "We don't get to do trials on the effects of these policies, so figuring out the effects is really challenging. ... My research has been using new sources of data to come up with better evidence for these effects." She says her goals include addressing some of the key economic questions, such as what causes recessions and how policy makers can help us avoid them, and helping to make the field of economics more of an empirical discipline that relies on evidence to make predictions. "Macroeconomics is really about situations where everything is affecting everything else and in that situation it's hard to learn things," she says. "Learning more things about how the world works will help reduce the influence of ideology." For more on this, see the announcement at the American Economic Association. Other stories on this topic appeared in The Economist, Bloomberg, and Yahoo Finance.