Two Endangered Glass Frogs Discovered Near Andean Mining Sites

An international team of biologists and researchers have identified two new species of endangered glass frogs near active mining areas in the Andes, discoveries they say highlight the region’s “cryptic diversity” while simultaneously underscoring the importance of conservation in a global hotspot for biodiversity.

With similar color patterns and transparent abdomens, the Mashpi glass frog (Hyalinobatrachium mashpi) and the Nouns’ glass frog (Hyalinobatrachium nouns) look very similar to other members of its genus. They also exhibit similar behavioral patterns—namely extended parental care—as related species of glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium).

But bioacoustic analysis of Mashpi glass frog’s unique call and improvements to DNA sequencing helped researchers differentiate the species from their closest relatives. Their findings are outlined in a new article in PeerJ, an open-access journal of biological sciences, and conclude more than seven years of observation and comparative analysis of species across Central and South America.

Highlighting “Cryptic Diversity”

More than 1,000 amphibian species—including 83 members of the Centrolenidae family—are found scattered across the Andes, a majority of which can only be found in narrow mountain ranges and river valleys that dot the terrain.

“A lot of these sites are incredibly remote, which is one of the reasons why we were able to discover new species,” explained Becca Brunner, a PhD candidate in environmental science, policy, and management and one of the study’s first authors. “You can walk just a couple of kilometers over a ridge and find a different community of frogs than where you started.”

Evolutionary biologist Juan M. Guayasamín, a professor at Universidad San Francisco de Quito in Ecuador and Brunner’s co-first author, said identification of H. mashpi and H. nouns exemplifies the region’s “cryptic diversity.”

Rausser College of Natural Resources · Mashpi glass frog (H. mashpi) call

Biologists originally confused H. mashpi with H. valerioi, a lowland glass frog, due to their strong physical resemblance. The frogs were basically indistinguishable, but by comparing comprehensive DNA samples and call recordings with similar species in Central America, Colombia, and other areas of Ecuador, Brunner and Guayasamín were able to discern that the similar individuals were actually two unique species.

Brunner, who studies amphibian vocalizations and bioacoustics, was able to analyze recorded H. mashpi calls to determine differences in frequency, duration, and timing.

“When you analyze the different call characteristics of other glass frogs, you can tell that the calls of H. mashpi don’t overlap,” Brunner said. “In other words, its call is the most distinguishing characteristic for the species.”

Researchers were unable to record H. nouns calls during their fieldwork due to issues accessing their habitat. Both species are typically found guarding fertilized egg clutches on the underside of leaves high above rivers. Subsequent DNA analysis revealed a substantial difference between the genetic makeup of H. mashpi and H. nouns.

“The problem is not finding new species, the real challenge is having the time and resources to describe them,” Guayasamín said. “Taxonomists are an endangered kind of scientist.”

A Call for Conversation

The researchers are concerned that the Ecuadorian government’s embrace of explorative and extractive mining will threaten Andean biodiversity. Due to the associated threat of population decline or extinction, Brunner and Guayasamin recommend listing both species as “Endangered” under guidelines established by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Both H. mashpi and H. nouns are located in forest regions that have suffered agriculture-related deforestation over the past decades. H. nouns were observed in areas with active mining operations, while H. mashpi was observed in areas adjacent to existing mining leases. 

“The few remaining patches are now under the pressure of mining activities, which are highly polluting and have the opposition of numerous local communities,” Guayasamín said.

A frog’s ability to breathe underwater through cutaneous respiration—a process where gas exchange occurs across the skin rather than lungs or gills—makes them highly vulnerable to water-related pollution and habitat destruction. Brunner cautioned that the narrow distribution of species in the Andes makes H. mashpi and H. nouns incredibly susceptible to disruption.

“If a mining company came in and destroyed the few streams where we know these frogs exist, that's probably extinction for the species,” Brunner said.

Ecuador made global headlines in 2008 by adopting a new constitution that established the right for “Pachamama,” or Mother Earth, to exist and to “maintain and regenerate its cycles, structure, functions and evolutionary processes.”

These protections were recently affirmed in a suit brought before Ecuador’s Constitutional Court, which ruled that mining activities in the Los Cedros nature preserve violated the protected area’s right to exist. Brunner welcomed the ruling as a good example of “giving teeth to the rights of nature.”

Additional authors of the study include postdoctoral researcher Ayelet Valencia-Aguilar and Professor Eva Ringler, of the University of Bern in Switzerland; field biologist Daniela Franco, of Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Anderson Medina and Carlos Morochz, research biologists at the Mashpi Lodge; Lucas Bustamante, conservation biologist and photographer with Tropical Herping; Tucson-based biodiversity researcher Ross Maynard, of The Biodiversity Group; and Jaime Culebras, an amphibian researcher and nature photographer with Fundación Condor Andino.

Brunner’s fieldwork was supported by a National Geographic Explorer Grant (EC-57058R-18).