Ziad Obermeyer

Ziad Obermeyer

Title
Associate Professor
Department
School of Public Health
Research Expertise and Interest
machine learning, and medicine, health policy
Research Description

Ziad Obermeyer is Associate Professor at UC Berkeley, where he does research at the intersection of machine learning, medicine, and health policy. He was named an Emerging Leader by the National Academy of Medicine, and has received numerous awards including the Early Independence Award -- the National Institutes of Health’s most prestigious award for exceptional junior scientists -- and the Young Investigator Award from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Previously, he was an Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School. He continues to practice emergency medicine in underserved communities. 

See Ziad Obermeyer's personal website.

In the News

April 21, 2020

Understanding and seeking equity amid COVID-19

In today’s Berkeley Conversations: COVID-19 event, Jennifer Chayes, associate provost of the Division of Computing, Data Science, and Society and dean of the School of Information, spoke with three UC Berkeley experts about how relying on data and algorithms to guide pandemic response may actually serve to perpetuate these inequities — and what researchers and data scientists can do to reverse the patterns.
October 24, 2019

Widely used health care prediction algorithm biased against black people

From predicting who will be a repeat offender to who’s the best candidate for a job, computer algorithms are now making complex decisions in lieu of humans. But increasingly, many of these algorithms are being found to replicate the same racial, socioeconomic or gender-based biases they were built to overcome.

In the News

April 21, 2020

Understanding and seeking equity amid COVID-19

In today’s Berkeley Conversations: COVID-19 event, Jennifer Chayes, associate provost of the Division of Computing, Data Science, and Society and dean of the School of Information, spoke with three UC Berkeley experts about how relying on data and algorithms to guide pandemic response may actually serve to perpetuate these inequities — and what researchers and data scientists can do to reverse the patterns.
October 24, 2019

Widely used health care prediction algorithm biased against black people

From predicting who will be a repeat offender to who’s the best candidate for a job, computer algorithms are now making complex decisions in lieu of humans. But increasingly, many of these algorithms are being found to replicate the same racial, socioeconomic or gender-based biases they were built to overcome.

Featured in the Media

Please note: The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or positions of UC Berkeley.
August 10, 2020
Casey Ross
The federal government has systematically shortchanged communities with large Black populations in the distribution of billions of dollars in COVID-19 relief aid meant to help hospitals struggling to manage the effects of the pandemic, according to a recently published study. "We are finding large-scale racial bias in the way the federal government is distributing" the funds to hospitals, said Ziad Obermeyer, a physician and a co-author of the study from the University of California, Berkeley. "If you take two hospitals getting the same amount of funding under the CARES Act, the dollars have to go further in Black counties than they do elsewhere," he said. "Effectively that means there are fewer things the health systems can do in those counties, like testing, buying more personal protective equipment, or doing outreach to make sure people are being tested."
April 6, 2020
Sharon Begley
A study co-led by acting associate public health professor Ziad Obermeyer MD, finding that a software program commonly used in the health care industry is racially biased, has won the Editor's Pick award in the 2020 STAT Madness contest for the best innovations in science and medicine for the year. According to this reporter: "The artificial intelligence software equated health care spending with health, and it had a disturbing result: It routinely let healthier white patients into the programs ahead of black patients who were sicker and needed them more. ... It was one of the clearest demonstrations yet that some, and perhaps many, of the algorithms that guide the health care given to tens of millions of Americans unintentionally replicate the racial blind spots and even biases of their developers. ... The researchers didn't just publish their work and move on. Instead, they worked with the builders of the algorithm to fix it. And after hearing from insurers, hospitals, and others concerned that their algorithms, too, might be racially biased, they established an initiative at the Booth School to work pro bono with health systems and others to remedy that." For more on this study, see our press release at Berkeley News.
November 18, 2019
Amina Khan
An algorithm widely used by health insurers to make critical care decisions reflects strong racial biases, a team of scientists led by acting associate public health professor Ziad Obermeyer MD has found, and that has led to poorer outcomes for black patients, compared to white patients. "We shouldn't be blaming the algorithm," Dr. Obermeyer says. "We should be blaming ourselves, because the algorithm is just learning from the data we give it." Setting out to fix the problem, Dr. Obermeyer's team developed an alternative model that reduced the bias by 84%, and shared it with the algorithm's manufacturer. For more on this, see our press release at Berkeley News. Stories on this topic have appeared in dozens of sources around the world, including KQED Radio's Forum (link to audio), Managed Healthcare Executive, Health IT Analytics, News-Medical, Market Screener, and Mic.
FullStory (*requires registration)

Loading Class list ...
.